#Oklahoma 2 EF-5 #Tornadoes in 11 days – Phased Array Radar

Since the year 1905 to present [2013], there have been 11 F-5 and 3 EF-5 [since the Enhanced Fujita Scale was adopted by the National Weather Service in 2007] Tornadoes in Oklahoma.

In the last 2 years [ May 2011 to May 2013 ] there have been 3 EF-5 tornadoes in Oklahoma. Before then, the last F-5 tornado was on May 3 1999. There was a gap between 1999 and 2010 where NO F-5 / EF-5 were recorded.

What are the odds that 3 of the strongest tornadoes, including the largest tornado in recorded history, have hit this area in the past 2 years, with the last F-5 / EF-5 being 12 years prior ? 2 of these were within 11 days of each in 2013.

The same can be said of F-4 and EF-4 tornadoes in Oklahoma. Going back to May 3 1999 through November 7 2011 [ the last F-4/EF-4], there have been 9 EF-4 Tornadoes in Oklahoma. There was a gap between 1999 and 2002 where NO F-4/EF-4 were recorded.

There have been 60[sixty] F-5 / EF-5 tornadoes from 1950 to present. I’m very aware of how many tornadoes strike in the US every year. That’s why this is doesn’t make natural sense to me.

So what am I getting at here ?

We know that ‘the powers that be’ manipulate the weather. In many instances in the past they’ve told us this. But much like ‘Big Brother is Watching’ [recent news], many do not believe it. I guess the reason is, there is yet to be a Whistleblower on weather modification. I know there have been some in the past, but they were disregarded or labeled as conspiracy theorists. Imagine that !

***

In the year 2000, the United States Navy loaned one of their ‘phased array antenna’ to the National Weather Service [ Navy ships originally used AEGIS phased array radar (called SPY-1) technology to protect naval battle groups from missile threats.].

The Phased Array Radar was set up in Norman, Oklahoma and became operational in September 2003. The first data collected was in May 2004. They say it uses 750 KW of power or about as much as 100 residential homes (3000 ft) with AC running. The range of it is 240 miles.

Now if you’ll recall what I said above, There was a gap between 1999 and 2010 where NO F-5 / EF-5 were recorded and then 3 of the strongest tornadoes, including the largest tornado in recorded history, have hit in the past 2 years …. AND … There was a gap between 1999 and 2002 where NO F-4/EF-4 were recorded. .. It seems this area has become quite active since the ‘phased array antenna’ became operational in 2003

So they set up this radar and have been testing it since 2003. In the last 2 years it seems they’ve ramped it up, I guess to see if they could make the most destructive force on the planet short of military action. The saddest part is, this weapon of mass weather modification is aimed at the people of the USA.

Click images below for animation [gif files]

Phased Array Radar May 20 2013 Moore, Oklahoma EF-5

Phased Array Radar May 20 2013 Moore, Oklahoma EF-5

Phased Array Radar May 31 2013 ElReno, Oklahoma EF-5

Phased Array Radar May 31 2013 ElReno, Oklahoma EF-5

One of the most intriguing / coincidental aspects about this new Phased Array Radar system is this. And quote – “More than 350 FAA radars and by 2025, nearly 150 of the nation’s Doppler weather radars will need to be either replaced or have their service life extended.” – end quote. … Why you ask ? Because in August 1996 a research paper was presented to the United States Airforce titled, Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025
Hmmm 2025 seems to be on track.

What I’m getting at here is this seems like a co-inky-dink! Of course we all know there is no such thing as a coincidence when it comes to the ‘powers that be’.

I have been aware of the Research paper Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025
for many years. Some of you newcomers may not, so here is the link via fas.org [Federation of American Scientists] – http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm

In Memory of Dr. Doug

NOAA: 2012 saw second largest rise in climate emissions on record

The last paragraph is the kicker LMFAO. [open quote] “The World Bank warns that such a level of warming would lead to widespread droughts, powerful hurricanes and mass extinctions” [close quote] And they’re right ! After all, these phuckers control the weather, just like they decide on which nation to unleash Weapons of Mass Destruction. Question: What the hell does a bank know about weather ? That’s right friends, they finance the machines that control it, to manipulate the sheeple into buying carbon credits ! Follow the money ..

You can manipulate the weather, but you can’t control mother nature. She’s been doing her thing for billions of years and NO amount of money will buy her off. Climate change is a given and will continue long after those presently here on earth are gone.

One other thing to point out here …. We are above the threshold for which they previously said ‘we’re doomed’. Kinda makes ya wonder doesn’t it ? Global Warming is one of the biggest lies ever told to man !

GW Hoax

Via: rawstory.com

Heat-trapping carbon emissions in the atmosphere grew so much in 2012 that the year will go down as the second-highest growth in recorded history, placing the globe dangerously near a climatic tipping point, scientists with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Tuesday.

Climate-causing emissions measured 48 times last year by a globally distributed network of atmospheric sensors showed that earth’s total atmospheric carbon content rose 2.67 parts per million (ppm) in 2012.

This means current atmospheric carbon is now at 395.09 ppm, far above the 350 ppm climate scientists like NASA’s James Hansen say is a safe limit. Any higher and earth’s weather systems begin to discharge the excess energy in the atmosphere through ever more powerful storms.

The last time the world saw such a large increase in emissions was 1998, which saw a rise of 2.93 ppm. Most scientists agree that restraining climate change to about 2 degrees of average global temperature rise would allow ecosystems to adapt, but increases of up to 4 or 5 degrees by the end of this century are expected if current trends are not averted.

NOAA’s Pieter Tans, who runs the government’s climate-tracking initiative, told The Associated Press that 2012′s growth in emissions means “the prospects of keeping climate change below that (2-degree goal) are fading away.”

The World Bank warns that such a level of warming would lead to widespread droughts, powerful hurricanes and mass extinctions — all of which would cause serious problems for human agriculture and water supplies, potentially spawning wars over resources as more of the human population is pushed away from flooded coastal areas.

Regulators Discover a Hidden Viral Gene in Commercial GMO Crops

Maybe they already know this and it’s all part of the depopulation plan ? Maybe they didn’t know and now that they do, they really don’t care. After all, most of us are useless eaters to the 1%. Silly Meat Puppet ….

via Independent Science News

In the course of analysis to identify potential allergens in GMO crops, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has belatedly discovered that the most common genetic regulatory sequence in commercial GMOs also encodes a significant fragment of a viral gene (Podevin and du Jardin 2012). This finding has serious ramifications for crop biotechnology and its regulation, but possibly even greater ones for consumers and farmers. This is because there are clear indications that this viral gene (called Gene VI) might not be safe for human consumption. It also may disturb the normal functioning of crops, including their natural pest resistance.

What Podevin and du Jardin discovered is that of the 86 different transgenic events (unique insertions of foreign DNA) commercialized to-date in the United States 54 contain portions of Gene VI within them. They include any with a widely used gene regulatory sequence called the CaMV 35S promoter (from the cauliflower mosaic virus; CaMV). Among the affected transgenic events are some of the most widely grown GMOs, including Roundup Ready soybeans (40-3-2) and MON810 maize. They include the controversial NK603 maize recently reported as causing tumors in rats (Seralini et al. 2012).

The researchers themselves concluded that the presence of segments of Gene VI “might result in unintended phenotypic changes”. They reached this conclusion because similar fragments of Gene VI have already been shown to be active on their own (e.g. De Tapia et al. 1993). In other words, the EFSA researchers were unable to rule out a hazard to public health or the environment.

In general, viral genes expressed in plants raise both agronomic and human health concerns (reviewed in Latham and Wilson 2008). This is because many viral genes function to disable their host in order to facilitate pathogen invasion. Often, this is achieved by incapacitating specific anti-pathogen defenses. Incorporating such genes could clearly lead to undesirable and unexpected outcomes in agriculture. Furthermore, viruses that infect plants are often not that different from viruses that infect humans. For example, sometimes the genes of human and plant viruses are interchangeable, while on other occasions inserting plant viral fragments as transgenes has caused the genetically altered plant to become susceptible to an animal virus (Dasgupta et al. 2001). Thus, in various ways, inserting viral genes accidentally into crop plants and the food supply confers a significant potential for harm.

See related [off site] – We’re not ready for genetic engineering

#DuPont breaks ground on $200M cellulosic #ethanol plant

I’m sure they expect a return on the ‘capital investment’. $10 a gallon sounds about right. SHIT .. It’ll cost $250 to fill my tank with this crap!

via smartplanet.com

The company announced Friday it has started construction on a $200 million cellulosic ethanol facility in Iowa. When the facility is completed in mid-2014, it will have the capacity to generate 30 million gallons annually of cellulosic biofuel produced from corn stover residues, a non-food feedstock consisting of corn stalks and leaves. ….

…. DuPont was able to optimize the process and technology at its pilot facility in Tennessee, which allowed it to increase the annual capacity at the Iowa plant, the company said. The commercial plant in Iowa will require a capital investment of about $7 per gallon of annual capacity.

dupont-cellulosic-ethanol-graphic